NATO GLADIO: Secret Armies
http://www.jar2.com/Topics/NATO.html
US/NATO Missiles 5 Minutes from Moscow, Goebbels Media Tactics, Supporting Nazis
31 May,
23:28
Washington
and all of the organizations and individuals responsible for the February 22
coup d'état in Kiev may be patting each other on the back, getting out the
cigars and congratulating themselves on a job well done but their victory is
one which has no meaning in the long term and will once again show to the
world, if it has not already, the completely myopic vision of the US foreign
policy establishment, the complete and total disregard for international law
and the lives of the world's peoples and the complete hypocrisy with which
they operate.
In the
long run the short lived victory will have the opposite effect than that
which the US believes it has achieved and even the US/NATO Prompt Global
Strike goal of placing nuclear missiles within a ten minute flight time of
Moscow, will in the end be a complete failure.
US/NATO and Prompt Global Strike
The
single most significant reason behind the fact that politicians, analysts,
specialists, journalists, diplomats and any other individual interested in
or attempting to follow and make sense of the events in Ukraine are all
having a hard time understanding the situation (other than the complete
Orwellian-Goebbels-Ministry of Truth turning night into day media operation)
is that the entire US/NATO/EU Ukraine Operation has at its core a purely
strategic military interest. This overriding military objective is the
neutralization of Russia's nuclear deterrence capabilities, this includes
rendering ineffective all elements of the Russia's nuclear Triad and the
ability to launch a first strike directly on Moscow, with Moscow being
unable to defend itself or launch its retaliatory strike. The "secret"
military objective is behind the entire destabilization effort in Ukraine,
just as the military objectives were at the core of the destruction of
country after country in the Middle East. Therefore all secondary events
subordinated to this core objective may not seem to make sense to the
observer who may only see hypocrisy, double standards and even
schizophrenic-like behavior coming from the West and from those
orchestrating seemingly unrelated events to coalesce into conditions
allowing for the attainment of their objective.
It does
not take the specialized training and acumen of an intelligence analyst or
military strategist to figure out the obvious. With the US Military Doctrine
now one with the idea of "preventive first strike" at its core (formulated
to officially grant legitimacy to the illegal strategy of aggressive war)
which means destroying a perceived enemy threat before it has a chance to
carry out any possible attack, the reason for US/NATO expansion and the
placing of first nuclear strike capable missiles and supporting
infrastructure around Russia and on its borders is clear.
Again
aggressive war is a Crime Against Peace and Crime Against Humanity but by
clever wording and by claiming national defense or defense of "US interests"
or even "NATO partners" such manipulation, while not changing international
law or the Geneva Conventions allows the US/NATO to be able to attack any
opponent without fear of retribution.
The real
purpose of the Prompt Global Strike (PGS) system, which officially foresees
US/NATO of being able to launch and deliver ballistic missiles to any point
on the planet under an hour, is carefully obfuscated and hidden by its
proponents and designers. The purpose of PGS, AEGIS and all of the elements
which make up the system is to allow the US, with NATO as a subordinate, to
launch a nuclear first strike. The PGS system, in addition to the nuclear
Triad also envisages a space launched kinetic weapon which would cause
impact damage similar to meteor strikes.
What we
have in effect, after the end of the Cold War, is an out of control US/NATO
military industrial complex which has continued to grow at an alarming rate
and has continued to devise new methods to annihilate countries and entire
populations through overt and covert means. This may be excused by
proponents of Pax Americana, neo-conservative chicken hawks and the whole
array of Russophobes and dreamers of a Fourth Reich poisoning the entire
planet, but expansion of NATO into a Global First Strike Expeditionary Force
is illegal and a threat to the world peace, security and stability.
NATO PGS
is just a key part of the plan for assisting the US in fulfilling its
strategic military and geopolitical goal of establishing complete and total
unchallenged American hegemony on the countries and peoples of the world.
There is no real threat to justify it as a defensive system and it must be
deemed illegal and stopped by the countries of the world who must finally
band together and demand peace and an end to those who are against it.
Back to
Ukraine and its strategic importance. With the development by the US/NATO of
hypersonic nuclear capable ICBMS if NATO is allowed to place its missiles in
Ukraine, if for example they are allowed to annex the eastern regions as
well and place NATO missiles near Novaya Guta for example, then they will
have their weapons only 450 kilometers (280 miles) from the heart of Moscow.
With the development of the latest hypersonic missiles which are said to be
able to travel at speeds of up to 3,600 miles per hour, that would allow the
US/NATO to deliver a nuclear strike directly on the Kremlin in 4.66 minutes,
a delivery time making a reaction extremely difficult.
Russia Implement a Similar Strategy?
Now just
for a moment imagine if Russia were implementing a similar strategy:
attempting to install missile elements less than 1,000 kilometers from
Washington; attacking countries all over South and North America,
overthrowing governments in Mexico, Canada and the like. Sound ridiculous?
But that is exactly what the US is doing. Imagine if the US had lost the
Cold War and agreed to become a Communist country and then the USSR started
invading and destroying all the countries around it, killing millions of
people in the process. That is exactly what US/NATO is doing and they must
be stopped.
Media Takeover
In order
to facilitate continuing illegal regime change operations and military
expansion the populations of the states who tax dollars are going to fund
all of it need to be cowed and dumbed down into submission. They need to be
manipulated into believing that there is a threat that warrants the
continued out of control growth of the US/NATO military machine. They also
need to be convinced that there is an enemy. Russia is that enemy. Hence
what we on the ground see as an alternative reality was created. They have
turned the facts on their head and in reality installed a nazi coup that is
killing the civilian population and they are attempting to blame Russia.
Russian General
Leonid Ivashov called the manipulation of the media by the US/NATO "the
using of Goebbels like methods
".
General Ivashov was the head of the Russian Ministry of Defense and is the
current president of the Academy of Geopolitical Studies:
“Apparently they [officials of the European Union and U.S. Secretary of
State John Kerry] have dedicated themselves, and continue to do so, to
deeply and thoroughly studying the doctrine of Dr. Goebbels. . . They
present everything backwards from reality. It is one of the formulas which
Nazi propaganda employed most successfully: . . . They accuse the party that
is defending itself, of aggression. What is happening in Ukraine and Syria
is is a project of the West, a new type of war: in both places you see a
clear anti-Russian approach, and as is well known, wars today begin with
psychological and information warfare operations. . . Kerry and Obama are
encouraging in Kiev what they harshly repress in their country. European
leaders break up unauthorized demonstrations with hoses, throwing
demonstrators in jail, while in the Ukrainian case they do the exact
opposite, and on top of that they threaten Russia. Logically, this is part
of information warfare.
“Keep in
mind that, under the cover of information commotion, U.S. ships are entering
the Black Sea, that is, near Ukraine. They are sending marines, and they
have also begun to deploy more tanks in Europe. . . We see that on the heels
of the disinformation operation a land-sea, and possibly air operation is
being prepared.
"They
haven't even taught [opposition leaders] Klitchko, Yatsenyuk and Tyahnybok
to run a government efficiently. The main thing is for them to take power,
and destroy the Ukrainian state."
The
Nation Destruction Business
After
9-11 Neo-Con Paul Wolfowitz, the then US Deputy Secretary of Defense stated
that the US Government is now in the business of destroying countries,
executing presidents and changing governments at will.
General
Wesley Clark who was the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, took issue with
the Neo-Con architects from the Project for a New American Century and gave
testimony that the US planned to overthrow seven countries after 9/11: Iraq,
Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
Mr. Clark
called the post 9-11 overtaking of the US Government a coup and said it was
plotted by Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and "a half dozen other
collaborators from the Project for the New American Century". In a report
Glen Greenwald cites a US Secretary of Defense Memo which gave even more
detail and put a timeframe on the plan: "I just got this memo from the
Secretary of Defense’s office. It says we’re going to attack and destroy the
governments in 7 countries in five years – we’re going to start with Iraq,
and then we’re going to move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and
Iran."
My
List of Countries
Destroyed
by US/CIA/NATO
The
following is a list of countries, other than Ukraine, where the US has
organized coup d’états, supported revolutions, overthrown governments,
invaded, annexed, supported groups or forces who overthrew or attempted to
overthrow governments or outright executed the leaders.
Afghanistan, Albania, Angola, Argentina, Bolivia, Bosnia, Brazil, Cambodia,
Chile, China, Colombia, Colorado, Congo, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El
Salvador, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Guam, Guatemala, Haiti, Hawaii,
Honduras, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Korea, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia,
Libya, Macedonia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Philippines,
Puerto Rico, Russia, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, South Dakota, Sudan,
Syria, Turkey, Uruguay, USSR, Venezuela, Vietnam, Virgin Islands, Yemen,
Yugoslavia and Zaire (Congo).
What they
have done and are doing to Native Americans might also be added to the list
and as the continuing genocide of the indigenous peoples is the foundation
of endemic "American" racism and exceptionalism.
NATO Continuing its Global Expansion - By John Robles 5 April 2012, 12:04
Just when humble shell-shocked little-old-you thought it was maybe, sort of,
just quite possibly, kind of, a little safe to pop your head out of your
marginally cozy self-delusional hiding place (a secret place you created to
withstand the mind-numbing daily onslaught of images and reports of endless
war, violence, genocide, corruption, unrest and the expanded
“Democratization” of the entire planet), COMING SOON to a naïve, trusting,
albeit; greedy and just morally-repugnant-enough-to-be-pliant COUNTRY
NEAR YOU, A NEW and EXPANDED US/NATO PRESENCE (or its surrogate, doesn’t
matter).
According to an Official Statement by Dr. Brad Roberts to the US House Armed
Services Committee, dated March 6, 2012, in which he requests funding for US
Missile Programs, the US is: implementing the principles of the phased
adaptive approach in the Asia-Pacific and the Middle East (regions) and
building on the existing foundations of U.S. cooperation. He writes; these
regional approaches must be tailored to the unique mix of threat and
geography in each region and that the footprint of U.S. military presence is
different in each region, and will evolve in different ways over the coming
decade.” In other words what we see now is just part of a long term
plan of global domination.
According to the same document, in the Asia-Pacific Region: Japan has
acquired its own layered missile defense system, and the United States and
Japan are partnering in the co-development of an advanced version of the
SM-3 interceptor, the SM-3 Block IIA, and the United States and Australia
signed a memorandum of understanding on missile defense cooperation in 2004
and partnership on ballistic missile defense research and development, most
notably in the field of sensors. The United States also continues to consult
with the Republic of Korea regarding its future ballistic missile defense
requirements. The US also engages in a trilateral dialogue with Japan
and Australia and another trilateral dialogue with Japan and the Republic of
Korea. This is important because it is the US engaging in talks but it is
its surrogate NATO, which will be key in implementing the military
structures and presence. The
document goes on to out-line plans for the Middle East including: improving
interoperability between U.S. and Israeli missile defense systems and the
2008 deployment a forward-based radar in Israel. It states that the US
Administration has requested nearly $450 million for Israeli rocket and
missile defense between FY 2010 and 2013 and secured an additional $205
million in FY2011 to procure Iron Dome defense systems. $655 million is just
for Israel. In a country faced with an economic crisis with the common
people not even able to be provided with healthcare, this is a huge sum just
for Israel.
Also, according to the same document, in the Middle East the US is working
with a number of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries on missile
defense, including the selling of U.S. missile defenses through the Foreign
Military Sales program and the US is promoting interoperability and
information sharing among the GCC states which they say will allow for more
efficient missile defenses and could lead to greater security cooperation in
the region. A
very key phrase in the document is one stating that; “… the primary purpose
of the phased adaptive approaches to regional missile defense is to build
upon a solid foundation to achieve improvements over the coming decade.”
This phrase is important because it shows the plans for expansion and the
forward thinking that it behind the whole approach. Meaning, to put it
bluntly, today we have a few missiles in your face and tomorrow we have you
surrounded and neutralized.
Another key figure is the amount that is being requested, and one must keep
in mind that this for missile defense only, this does not include other
military expenditures by the US and NATO. The document states that; “… the
Fiscal Year 2013 budget request is $9.7 billion and $47.4 billion over the
next five years to develop and deploy missile capabilities.” The document
also claims that the phased adaptive approach is fully in line with the main
themes of U.S. defense strategy in a period of budget austerity. They call
$47.4 billion in line with budget austerity?!
These are just two regions that they mention; let us not forget that NATO
and the US are expanding their “military footprint” (using their term) in
the Arctic, in the Caucuses, in India and even into the Russian Federation
itself, with the “harmless” renting of the Uzhni Airbase, a move opposed by
the Communist Party and one that must be scrutinized under a microscope if
it is to be seriously considered.
Also affecting the situation close to home is NATO’s continued love affair
with Georgian President Saakashvili. On April 3rd the NATO-Georgia
Commission met in NATO headquarters in Brussels with Saakashvili and
Rasmussen both present. Rasmussen, the NATO Secretary General, said “A
forceful statement with regard to cooperation with Georgia may be made at
the NATO Chicago summit in late May 2012.” However he did not confirm that
NATO would grant Georgia a NATO Membership Action Plan at the Chicago summit
nor in what way exactly NATO would express its support to Georgia. Rasmussen
said that the statement on Georgia will express NATO’s gratitude to Georgia
for sending the largest military group of non-NATO member countries to
Afghanistan, the alliance will confirm an important contribution of Georgia
to trans-Atlantic cooperation and would once again acknowledge and welcome
the Georgian wish to join it.
Speaking recently on Chicago Public Media about a NATO debate and calling
for the disbandment of NATO, something many believe should have been done
when the Warsaw Pact collapsed, NATO expert and anti-NATO activist Rick
Rozoff called the Alliance: “… a lawless, aggressive, constantly expanding
threat to the post-World War Two international political order and security
system … and … a bellicose Western axis launching wars at will as far away
from the North Atlantic Ocean as the Balkans, South Asia and North Africa,
dividing and destroying nations in sanguinary rampages from the former
Yugoslavia to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Libya to the Gulf of Aden. And
completing the military encirclement of Russia, with Iran next and China
after it, replete with an extension of the U.S.-NATO European interceptor
missile system into the Persian Gulf, the South Caucasus, India and the
general Asia-Pacific region. “ Mr. Rozoff finished a post to his mailing list recently with a simple question which I would like to echo, he asked: “When will the true world community come to its senses and demand that NATO be abolished?” I second that motion and add, isn’t it time we all woke up? Or perhaps it is already too late.
|